IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J.J. MUNIR, J.
Durga Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13938 of 2023
Decided on : 08-04-2024
Disciplinary Action - Nagar Palika Parishad - U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 34(1-A), 34(1-B), 77B(5) - The court interpreted the limitations of the District Magistrate's powers under the Act, concluding that the State Government's directive for disciplinary action against the petitioner was ultra vires and thus invalid.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Senior Clerk at Nagar Palika Parishad, was suspended based on allegations of financial irregularities following a complaint. The District Magistrate recommended disciplinary action, which led to the suspension order by the President of the Nagar Palika.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the District Magistrate overstepped his authority by interfering in the Nagar Palika's disciplinary matters, and the State Government's directive to initiate disciplinary proceedings was beyond its powers under the U.P. Municipalities Act.
Issues: Whether the District Magistrate had the authority to interfere in the disciplinary matters of the Nagar Palika Parishad and whether the State Government could direct the President to initiate disciplinary proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the powers of the District Magistrate and State Government under Section 34 of the U.P. Municipalities Act do not extend to directing disciplinary actions against employees of the Nagar Palika, which must be exercised independently by the President.
Result: The impugned suspension order dated 30.5.2023 is quashed.
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble J.J. Munir, J.-The petitioner is a Senior Clerk in the employ of the Nagar Palika Parishad, Siswa Bazar, District Maharajganj. He was appointed to a Class-III post in the regular cadre on 22.2.1989 in accordance with rules. A complaint was lodged by one Shesh Nath, a resident of Senani Nagar, Ward No. 12, Nagar Palika Parishad, Siswa Bazar, District Maharajganj with the District Magistrate, Maharajganj on 13.2.2023, where the crux of the allegation was that the civil work, that had already been done, was re-advertised by the President and the Executive Officer of the Nagar Palika Parishad for a fresh contract through e-tendering. The District Magistrate, Maharajganj directed an inquiry to be made into the complaint by a Committee comprising the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Nichlaul, Maharajganj and the Executive Engineer, Jal Nigam (Rural). This was apparently a preliminary inquiry ordered by the District Magistrate into the complaint aforesaid. The Committee comprising the Sub Divisional Magistrate and the Executive Engineer submitted an inquiry report dated 16.2.2023 to the District Magistrate, Maharajganj. The District Magistrate, on the basis of the aforesaid inquiry report, addressed a memo dated 17.2.2023 to the Principal Secretary, Government of U.P. in the Department of Urban Development, saying that the report dated 27.1.2023 submitted by the Committee constituted by him showed that the Senior Clerk (the petitioner here), the Executive Officer, the President and the Junior Engineer (P.W.D.) advertised civil works that had already been done, inviting e-tenders for the purpose, which constitutes financial irregularity, and that the e-tender publication was in violation of para No. 6 of Government Order No. 1319/ukS-9-21-45 t21 dated 30.6.2021. It was said to be in violation of the aforesaid Government Order because it constituted a violation of the directions carried in paragraph No. 6, which would be observed in the matter of process of accepting tenders. The letter also reported that the Collector on his part had directed the cancellation of those tenders. The memo dated 17.2.2023 addressed to the Government said that vide Office Memo No. 2855-LBA-2022-23 dated 28.6.2022, Office Memo No. 778-LBA-2022-23 dated 14.11.2022 and Office Memo No. 282-LBA-2022-23 dated 19.12.2022, a letter had been issued for holding disciplinary proceedings against the President, Nagar Palika Parishad for violation of rules that he committed, besides irregularities, and proceedings on the basis of said letter were pending. The District Magistrate finally reported to the Principal Secretary that on the basis of the preliminary inquiry report submitted by the Committee constituted by him, he was recommending initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the Executive Officer, the petitioner and the President of the Nagar Palika Parishad. It was also said that a copy of the preliminary inquiry report submitted by the Committee was enclosed.
2. In response to Memo No. 384-LBA-2022-23 dated 17.2.2023, last mentioned, addressed to the Principal Secretary, the Special Secretary to the Government in the Department of Urban Development addressed Memo No. 838/ ukS-6-23 dated 16.5.2023, saying that the petitioner was a Senior Clerk belonging to the Non-Centralized Service. His Appointing Authority was the Executive Officer/President of the Nagar Palika Parishad. The Special Secretary, therefore, said in his letter that he had been directed to say that the Appointing Authority should be directed to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and the Government informed about the proceedings taken. A copy of the aforesaid memo dated 16.5.2023 issued by the Special Secretary addressed to the District Magistrate, Maharajganj was marked to the Executive Officer of the Nagar Palika Parishad with instructions that the Secretary be informed about steps taken in the matter at the earliest.
3. Acting on the aforesaid direction by the
The court established that the State Government cannot direct disciplinary actions against Nagar Palika employees, as such powers are limited under the U.P. Municipalities Act.
The District Magistrate's authority to interfere with Nagar Palika matters is limited to public safety concerns under Section 34 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916.
The District Magistrate's power to interfere with the decisions of Nagar Palika Parishad is limited to specific circumstances outlined in Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916.
State government lacks jurisdiction to annul municipal appointments made in compliance with statutory provisions absent clear evidence of fraud.
The court emphasized the need for fair and just exercise of power by the State Government, the importance of considering the President's explanation, and the requirement to follow principles of natur....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of conducting a full-fledged inquiry into the charges against an elected representative of the people and the emphasis on the princ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation, its Commissioner, and General Body Resolution had no jurisdiction to issue, confirm, approve, sanction, ratify the suspension....
The appointing authority can serve as the disciplinary authority under the amended Grama Panchayat Act, as per the provisions of the Act and OCS Rules.
Point of Law : Municipal Corporation - Suspension order - Suspension of a Chairman or a Member of a Municipal Board pending enquiry being an interim measure, suspension does not result in civil or ev....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.