IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Sandeep N.Bhatt, J.
Alpabala Dilipkumar Sabwa & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Anr. – Respondents
Special Civil Application No. 12460 of 2022
Decided On : 09-09-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 –Article 226, 227, 141 - Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Section 263(1), 87, 45, 49, 87, 263 - Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act, 1963 -Section 46 - Panchayat Act, 1996 -Section 253 - Empowers all the High Courts of India to issue the writs - High Court Cannot Go Deep Into Factual Issues Like An Appellate Body- Binding effect of rulings of Supreme Court -Whether such places are vested in municipality or not; removing noxious vegetation; and abating all public nuisances –Held, Court in full agreement with submissions made by learned Government Pleader that State Government has validly exercised its powers under Section 263 of Act after following due procedure under law and decision is arrived after considering all relevant materials and impugned order passed by State Government dissolving is not found either perverse or arbitrary or by colorable exercise of powers or against principles of natural justice -Therefore, Court found that there is no valid grounds to interfere with impugned order passed by State Government by exercising my jurisdiction under section 226 of Constitution of India - In view of this, Court find that present petition is meritless and requires to be dismissed - Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present petition is filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order impugned dated 30.06.2022 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Urban Development and Urban Housing Department, Government of Gujarat - respondent No.1, by which the body of the Botad Nagarpalika is dissolved.
2. The facts leading to filing of this petition are as under :
2.1 The last election of Botad Nagarpalika was held on 28.02.2021 and the election of President and Vice-President was held on 20.03.2021, in which Ms.Rajeshwariben Rajubhai Vora was elected as President of Botad Nagarpalika. However, as the elected members of ruling party-BJP had grievances against President - Ms.Rajeshwariben, she resigned from the said post on 05.05.2022.
2.2 Thereafter, once again the agenda for the election of President and Vice-President has been issued, wherein BJP has issued mandate in favour of one Ms.Dharmishtaben Upendrabhai Jotaniya for the post of President. However, the elected members of BJP revolted and 23 members gave vote in favour of petitioner no.1, who was councillor from Ward no.10 of Botad, on 31.5.2022 and therefore, the petitioner no.1 was elected as President.
2.3 Thereafter, as the petitioner no.1 was elected as President against the whip of BJP, the local organization of BJP with the help of State BJP started harassing the councilors and ensured that maximum number of councilors leave the group of petitioners. It is the case of the petitioners that 8 councilors who had supported the petitioner no.1 at the election of President are no more with her group.
2.4 Thereafter, on 22.6.2022 general Board of Nagarpalika met and Vice President was elected on 29.6.2022.
2.5 It is the case of the petitioners that on 13.6.2022, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner no.1 and elected members of Botad Nagarpalika through respondent no.1 calling upon the Nagarpalika as to why the Nagarpalika should not be dissolved under Section 263(1) of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act' for short), alleging that the elected body of the Nagarpalika has failed to discharge the duties entrusted upon it under the Act and that Nagarpalika is unable to discharge its duties.
2.6 Pursuant to the said show cause notice, the Special General Board meeting of Board was convened on 22.6.2022 and draft reply to the said show cause notice was placed before the Board. However, the respondent no.1 refused to accept the same and called upon the petitioners to submit the reply alongwith entire proceedings.
2.7 Thereafter, on 28.6.2022, the petitioners submitted reply to the respondent no.1 along with the annexures. The petitioners submit, that immediately on 30.6.2022, without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, passed the orders and dissolved the Nagarpalika under Section 263(1) of the Act and also appointed respondent no.1 as Administrator. Therefore, the present petition is filed.
2.8 Rule. Learned AGP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. With consent of the learned advocates, this matter is taken up for final hearing today.
3. Heard Mr. Bharat T. Rao learned advocate for the petitioners and Ms. Manisha Lavkumar Shah, learned Government Pleader with Ms. Shruti Pathak, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State Authorities.
3.1 Mr. Rao, learned advocate for the petitioners has submitted that the impugned order passed by respondent No.1 is an abuse of process of law, misuse of powers vested to the Authority and without appreciating the material available on record, as the show-cause notice was issued on 13.06.2022 to the petitioners, reply to the said show-cause notice was submitted on 28.06.2022 and the impugned order is passed on 30.06.2022 by the concerned Authority. He has submitted that it is a case of victimization as the Authority has acted on the basis of the show-cause notice only and has not kept in view the reply submitted by the petitioner/s.
He has submitt
Constitution of India Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225
Savitaben Madhukar Makiwana V/s State of Gujarat
Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar & Others
State Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) 3 SCC 625
State of Gujarat V/s. Savitaben M. Makwana
State of U.P. v. Raja Ram Jaiswal
Union Public Service Commission v. Hiranyalal Dev
V.N. Rabari V. State of Gujarat
Varvabhai Nathabhai Rabari & Ors. V. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Anjar Municipality versus J.M. Vyas
Constitution S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) 3 SCC 1
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke v. Dr. B.S. Mahajan
Hiralal G. Siyal and Ors V/s. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Jigya Yadav versus Central Board of Secondary Education
Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Madras V. P.S. Rajagopal Naidu & Govindarajulu & Ors.
Jt. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Madras versus P.S. Rajagopal Naidu
Jyotiben R. Pathak versus Rafiqsa Chammansad Fakir
Maheshkumar Kantilal Dave versus Development Commissioner
Major General I. P. S Dewan v. Union of India
Mohd. Mustafa versus Union of India
Rafiqsa Chammansa Fakir V/s. J. M. Vyas
Ram Avtar Sharma v. State of Haryana
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir versus District Collector, Raigad
The court affirmed that Section 263 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, allowing dissolution of municipalities under specific conditions, is constitutional and compliant with Article 243U of the Const....
Point of Law : vice that attaches to an order passed in contravention of the Rules of natural justice cannot be cured ex post facto by affording to the person affected thereby an opportunity to repre....
The decision emphasized the need for grave and exceptional circumstances to justify removal under Section 37 of the Act, and highlighted the importance of collective responsibility for decisions made....
The court established that the State Government cannot direct disciplinary actions against Nagar Palika employees, as such powers are limited under the U.P. Municipalities Act.
The court emphasized the importance of detailed reasons in a show-cause notice and upheld the jurisdiction of the authorities to exercise powers under the Act.
Point of law: The Court is also mindful that there is no specific embargo on exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India even at notice stage, but in the circumstances of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.