SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2074

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SALIL KUMAR RAI, SURENDRA SINGH-I, JJ.
Abc D/o Deep Chand - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 32785 of 2023
Decided On : 06-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sadrul Islam Jafri, Ambreen Masroor and N.I. Jafri.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court affirmed that a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy, especially in cases of rape, is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, emphasizing her autonomy and bodily integrity.

Headnote:

Abortion - Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Act No. 34 of 1971, Section 3 - The court interpreted Section 3 of the Act, emphasizing the conditions under which pregnancy can be terminated, particularly in cases of rape, and affirmed the woman's right to make reproductive choices under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a survivor of rape, sought medical termination of her pregnancy, which was at 21 weeks and 5 days. The court had previously ordered the CMO to carry out the termination based on medical reports and the legal framework governing such procedures.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was entitled to terminate her pregnancy under Section 3 of the Act No. 34 of 1971, as her case fell within the provisions allowing termination due to the circumstances of rape, and emphasized the importance of the woman's right to make decisions regarding her body.

Issues: Whether the petitioner, as an unmarried woman, could legally terminate her pregnancy under the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, given the circumstances of rape.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the distinction between married and unmarried women in the context of abortion is irrelevant to the intent of the law, which aims to protect women's health and autonomy, particularly in cases of rape.

Result: The court allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy.

JUDGMENT :

Surendra Singh-I, J.

On the previous date i.e. on 27.9.2023 considering the advance stage of pregnancy of the survivor which was 21 weeks and 5 days and the fact that the Court was to remain closed for the next five days i.e. from 28.9.2023 to 2.10.2023, the Court after considering the Medical Report dated 26.9.2023, directed the CMO Ghaziabad to carry out medical termination of pregnancy of the victim and send his report to this Court. It was also mentioned that the reasons for the order will be given later.

2. In pursuance to the order dated 27.9.2023 passed by us, the reasons for the said order are being stated below.

3. The provisions regarding medical termination of pregnancy is provided under Section 3 of the Act No. 34 of 1971 which as follows :

''3. When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the India Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,-

(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or

(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are, of the opinion, formed in good faith, that-

(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or

(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality.

Explanation 1.-For the purposes of clause (a), where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish caused by such pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

Explanation 2.-For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

(2A) The norms for the registered medical practitioner whose opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different gestational age shall be such as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act.

(2-B) The provisions of sub-section (2) relating to the length of the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of pregnancy by the medical practitioner where such termination is necessitated by the diagnosis of any of the substantial foetal abnormalities diagnosed by a Medical Board.

(2-C) Every State Government or Union territory, as the case may be, shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute a Board to be called a Medical Board for the purposes of this Act to exercise such powers and functions as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act.

(2-D) The Medical Board shall consist of the following, namely:-

(a) a Gynaecologist;

(b) a Paediatrician;

(c) a Radiologist or Sonologist; and Neutral Citation No. 2023:AHC:193291-DB

(d) such other number of members as may be notified in the Official Gazette by the State Government or Union territory, as the case may be].

(3) In determining whether the continuance of a pregnancy would involve such risk of injury to the health as is mentioned in sub-section (2), account may be taken of the pregnant woman's actual or reasonably foreseeable environment.

(4) (a) No pregnancy of a woman, who has not attained the age of eighteen years, or, who having attained the age of eighteen years, is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top