SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 53

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.
X (75) - Appellant
Versus
Fortis Hospital, Mohali - Respondent
CWP No. 75 of 2025
Decided On : 13-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties : Mr. Ketan Chopra Adv. , Mr. Pardeep Bajaj DAG, Punjab

The interpretation of 'change of marital status' in medical termination of pregnancy law encompasses situations of separation due to domestic abuse, ensuring autonomy and health of women.

Headnote:(A) The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3 - Rules of 2003 - Termination of pregnancy without consent of husband - Petitioner sought termination of her pregnancy (19 weeks) citing domestic violence and instability in marriage - Court highlighted the need for a broad interpretation of ‘change of marital status’ to include situations of domestic abuse and separation even without legal divorce. (Paras 12, 19)

(B) Reproductive rights - Court reaffirmed that the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy is an aspect of personal liberty and autonomy under Article 21 of the Constitution. (Paras 100-106)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a woman in her 19th week of pregnancy, underwent domestic abuse from her husband post-marriage due to issues including dowry, and sought to terminate her pregnancy claiming physical and mental health concerns. She was treated at two hospitals due to complications.

Findings of Court:
The Court recognized that the petitioner, despite not being legally divorced, was eligible for termination of pregnancy due to her changed marital circumstances and mental health concerns.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioner qualifies for pregnancy termination based on a non-legal separation due to domestic violence.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the interpretation of 'change of marital status' in the context of Rule 3B(c) includes separated women and is necessary to ensure the health and autonomy of women amid difficult domestic situations.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's circumstances justify termination request. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's analysis on marital status change impacts termination eligibility. (Para 5 , 12)
3. medical board's findings support termination eligibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. legal provisions concerning pregnancy termination reviewed. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. judicial precedents shape interpretations of termination laws. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. petitioner qualifies for abortion based on domestic situation. (Para 18 , 19)
7. court grants permission for medical abortion. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

Through the instant writ petition cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a tricenarian married woman, craves for issuance of directions upon the official respondents to terminate her pregnancy, without her husband’s consent. The petitioner claims her pregnancy to be medically terminable on account of her pregnancy length not exceeding the period prescribed for termination in The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1971’).

GROUNDS CANVASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION FOR SECURING THE RELIEF OF PREGNANCY TERMINATION

2. The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with one XXX XXX on 22.08.2024, however, immediately thereafter, she was subjected to cruelty by her in-laws family on account of bringing less dowry. Moreover, the husband of the petitioner also maltreated her and he even brought a portable camera twice in their bedroom to secretly record their personal moments. Not only this, the business of the petitioner’s husband also closed down and he became dependent on the petitioner and her parents for day to day needs and expenditure.

3. Despite all the atrocities, the petitioner went on performing her matrimonial obligations and after approx. 1½ months of her marriage, the petitioner came to know about her pregnancy, whereupon, she informed about it to her husband and also informed him that their marital life has just begun and their financial condition is also not stable, therefore, she is not mentally prepared for the baby. However, in order to restrain the petitioner from aborting pregnancy by taking contraceptive measures within the requisite period, the husband of the petitioner orchestrated the scenario of love and affection towards her. However, the atrocities upon the petitioner did not pause and she was manhandled by her in-laws family, which resulted in hers suffering minor pain and mental trauma. Consequently, the petitioner had to depart from the company of her husband and had to come to her parents house. The petitioner also made a police complaint about the atrocities committed upon her. Moreover, owing to the atrocities (supra), the petitioner started bleeding on 03.12.2024, whereupon, she was taken to Iqbal Nursing Home by her parents. However owing to lack of proper treatment, the petitioner’s parents also took her to DMC Hospital, Ludhiana, where she remained admitted from 03.12.2024 to 06.12.2024. In the medical summary report (Annexure P-3) prepared at the time of petitioner’s discharge from hospital, it was specifically observed that the petitioner is under stress and a victim of domestic violence.

4. Citing the hereinabove extracted facts and circumstances, especially her soured matrimonial relationship and her decision to walk out of her marriage, the petitioner claims that she does not want to continue with her unwanted pregnancy as it would cause grave injury to her physical and mental health, therefore, permission be granted to medically terminate her unwanted pregnancy.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THIS COURT AND REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DOCTORS

5. This Court had passed the hereinafter extracted order on 08.01.2025 upon the instant writ petition.

“On the oral request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the State of Punjab, through the Department of Health and Family Welfare, is impleaded as a necessary party to the instant petition.

The petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top