JUDGMENT :

Manish Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Panna Lal Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 as well as Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing of the impugned Revisional order dated 27.1.1982 passed by respondent No. 1 i.e. Deputy Director Consolidation, the impugned appellate order dated 17.7.1979 passed by respondent No. 2 i.e. Assistant Settlement Officer Consolidation and the judgment and order dated 3.10.1978 passed by respondent No. 3 i.e. Consolidation Officer.

3. During the pendency of present writ petition, the petitioner Munder had expired and in his place, his legal heirs have been substituted and they will be addressed as petitioners. Similarly, after the demise of respondent No. 4, Bhonu, his legal heirs have been substituted and they will be addressed as respondents.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that Raghunandan had five sons namely Abhilakh, Kabbil, Badri, Cheekhur and Ram Narayan. Abhilakh was issueless, Kabbil has three sons namely Bhonu, Ram Saran and Ram Samujh. Bhonu is respondent No. 4 in the present writ petition. Badri has one son Munder i.e. t