SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
Abrar - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 4288 of 2018
Decided on : 01-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Mishra, Santosh Kumar Giri.

The conviction for attempted murder under Section 307 IPC was upheld based on eyewitness accounts, while the charge under the Arms Act was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 307 - Arms Act, 1959 - Section 3/25 - Conviction for attempted murder with firearm - The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 307 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, sentencing him to 10 years and 1 year of imprisonment respectively, concurrent - Appeal arises from conviction for attempted murder and illegal possession of weapon. (Paras 1, 2, 5, 11)

(B) Evidence - Burden of proof - Prosecution's case established through eyewitness testimonies and circumstantial evidence, although lacking independent witnesses - The injured's testimony was central, but the recovery of weapon did not corroborate the attack. (Paras 2, 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
FIR lodged after the accused shot the informant’s father during a dispute over fish. The accused was arrested with a countrymade pistol. The FSL report indicated the weapon recovered did not match the bullet extracted from the victim. (Paras 3, 11)

Findings of Court:
Conviction for Section 307 IPC upheld due to direct evidence; however, conviction under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act was not substantiated. The sentence for attempted murder was reduced from 10 to 7 years. (Paras 12, 15)

Issues: The core issues include the evaluation of the evidence presented, the credibility of the witness statements, and whether the burden of proof was met for the charge under the Arms Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that circumstantial evidence might not be sufficient to secure a conviction under the Arms Act but affirmed the conviction for attempted murder based on eyewitness accounts. (Paras 11, 14)

Result: The appeal was partly allowed; the conviction for the attempted murder was affirmed, while the sentence under the Arms Act was set aside.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case and incident. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. judgment details conviction under ipc and arms act. (Para 2)
3. accused's denial and evidence overview. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
4. arguments regarding the credibility of witnesses. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. court’s analysis and reasoning for conviction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. final ruling and sentencing. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J. - Instant appeal arises out of the judgement and order dated 30.5.2018 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Fatehpur in S.T. No. 291 of 2015 (State v. Abrar) arising out of Case Crime No.245 of 2015, under Section 3 07 IPC, Police Station Bindki, District Fatehpur as well as S.T. No.292 of 2015, under Section 3 /25 ARMS ACT , arising out of Crime No. 250 of 2015, P.S. Bindki, District - Fatehpur, convicting the appellant under Sections 3 07) IPC and Section 3 /25 of ARMS ACT and sentencing him as under:

(i) under Section 307 IPC to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.10,000/- in default thereof he has to undergo one year additional imprisonment;

(ii) under Section 3 /25 of ARMS ACT to undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.1,000/- in default thereof he has to undergo one month additional imprisonment. Both the sentences are directed to run concurrently.

2. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Deepak Kapoor, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. The factual matrix of the case in brief relevant for the present appeal are that the de-facto complainant Rukhsana lodged an FIR at police station concerned on 18.7.2015 at 9:00 hours, on the basis of written report stating therein that his father Rashid had refused to give fish from his pond to accused Abrar on his demand and for that reason, the accused fired a shot at the father of the informant on 18.7.2015 at 7:00 hours in front of the house of Ahmad. He rushed his father to Government Hospital, Bindki with assistance of Gram Pradhan and co-villagers. His father was referred to Kanpur for treatment. FIR was lodged under Section 3 07 IPC at police station concerned. On the basis of secret information, the Investigating Officer arrested the accused during the course of investigation on 22.7.2015 at 12:50 hours near the trisection of Sarkandi, main road and recovered a countrymade pistol of .315 bore, one live cartridge and one empty shell of .315 bore. The Investigating Officer of case under Section 3 07 IPC prepared an arrest and recovery memo and got the signature of the accused and police witnesses thereon. The accused has confessed before police team that he used this countrymade pistol (tamancha) while firing a shot on Rashid on 18.7.2015 at 7:00 AM but his life was saved. He also stated that the empty shell is of the cartridge, which was used in commission of offence of attempt to murder. The local witnesses declined to stand as a witness for personal reasons. An FIR under Section 3 /25 of ARMS ACT was also lodged on the basis of recovery memo prepared by S.I. Krishna Kumar Mishra, who is Investigating Officer of case under Section 3 07 IPC on 22.5.2015 at 14:20 hours. The injured Hazi Rashid was admitted in Chandni Hospital, Private Ltd., Arya Nagar, Kanpur for treatment on 18.7.2015 at 9:40 AM having received gunshot injury and was discharged on 11.8.2015, as revealed from discharge slip of the hospital, which is Ex.Ka-12. He was also operated in said hospital on 18.7.2015, as he received gunshot injury on right chest wall. The operation papers were proved by concerned Doctor as Ex.Ka-13 and Ka-14. The countrymade pistol, one live cartridge and one empty cartridge shell were sent for ballistic examination to FSL, UP, Lucknow. The report of FSL dated 22.6.2017 is placed on record, which is exhibited as Ex.Ka11, wherein it is stated that one countrymade pistol of .315 bore, one empty cartridge shell of 8mm K.F. and live

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top