SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
Abrar - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. - 4288 of 2018
Decided on : 01-11-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Mishra,Santosh Kumar Giri
For the Respondent: G.A.

The court affirmed conviction for attempted murder while reducing the sentence due to mitigating circumstances, highlighting scrutiny of evidence in violent crime cases and the need for direct corroboration.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, Section 307 - Arms Act, Section 3/25 - Appeal against conviction for attempt to murder and possession of illegal arms - Appellant convicted and sentenced to 10 years for attempt to murder and 1 year under Arms Act, both running concurrently - Court scrutinized evidence, finding no direct witnesses, leading to reasonable doubt on gun possession - FSL report indicated discrepancies regarding the firearm's use in crime - Conviction under Section 307 IPC upheld, but sentence reduced to 7 years due to appellant’s custody since 2015 and context of case. (Paras 11-15)

(B) The court emphasized the necessity for direct evidence in criminal proceedings and enhanced scrutiny when charges involve firearms. (Paras 12-13)

Table of Content
1. details of charges and evidence presented (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. court’s analysis of the evidence and determination of reasonable doubt. (Para 2 , 5)
3. arguments presented by both sides regarding the evidence and witness credibility. (Para 6)
4. arguments regarding witness credibility and enmity (Para 7 , 8)
5. court's analysis of prosecution evidence (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. doubts cast on firearm recovery implications (Para 12)
7. affirmation of conviction with modified sentencing (Para 13 , 15)
8. final order and compliance instructions (Para 14 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.

1. Instant appeal arises out of the judgement and order dated 30.5.2018 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Fatehpur in S.T. No. 291 of 2015 ( State vs. Abrar ) arising out of Case Crime No.245 of 2015, under Section 3 07 IPC, Police Station Bindki, District Fatehpur as well as S.T. No.292 of 2015, under Section 3 /25 ARMS ACT , arising out of Crime No. 250 of 2015, P.S. Bindki, District - Fatehpur, convicting the appellant under Sections 3 07) IPC and Section 3 /25 of ARMS ACT and sentencing him as under:

    (i) under Section 307 IPC to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.10,000/- in default thereof he has to undergo one year additional imprisonment;

    (ii) under Section 3 /25 of ARMS ACT to undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.1,000/- in default thereof he has to undergo one month additional imprisonment. Both the sentences are directed to run concurrently.

2. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Deepak Kapoor, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. The factual matrix of the case in brief relevant for the present appeal are that the de-facto complainant Rukhsana lodged an FIR at police station concerned on 18.7.2015 at 9:00 hours, on the basis of written report stating therein that his father Rashid had refused to give fish from his pond to accused Abrar on his demand and for that reason, the accused fired a shot at the fater of the informant on 18.7.2015 at 7:00 hours in front of the house of Ahmad. He rushed his father to Government Hospital, Bindki with assistance of Gram Pradhan and co-villagers. His father was referred to Kanpur for treatment. FIR was lodged under Section 3 07 IPC at police station concerned. On the basis of secret information, the Investigating Officer arrested the accused during the course of investigation on 22.7.2015 at 12:50 hours near the trisection of Sarkandi, main road and recovered a countrymade pistol of .315 bore, one live cartridge and one empty shell of .315 bore. The Investigating Officer of case under Section 3 07 IPC prepared an arrest and recovery memo and got the signature of the accused and police witnesses thereon. The accused has confessed before police team that he used this countrymade pistol (tamancha) while firing a shot on Rashid on 18.7.2015 at 7:00 AM but his life was saved. He also stated that the empty shell is of the cartridge, which was used in commission of offence of attempt to murder. The local witnesses declined to stand as a witness for personal reasons. An FIR under Section 3 /25 of ARMS ACT was also lodged on the basis of recovery memo prepared by S.I. Krishna Kumar Mishra, who is Investigating Officer of case under Section 3 07 IPC on 22.5.2015 at 14:20 hours. The injured Hazi Rashid was admitted in Chandni Hospital, Private Ltd., Arya Nagar, Kanpur for treatment on 18.7.2015 at 9:40 AM having received gunshot injury and was discharged on 11.8.2015, as revealed from discharge slip of the hospital, which is Ex.Ka-12. He was also operated in said hospital on 18.7.2015, as he received gunshot injury on right chest wall. The operation papers were proved by concerned Doctor as Ex.Ka-13 and Ka-14. The countrymade pistol, one live cartridge and one empty cartridge shell were sent for ballistic examination to FSL, UP, Lucknow.

The repor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top