SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2137

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Rishabh Anand Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Awadhesh Kumar Malviya.
For the Respondents: Abhishek Shukla, Rishi Kant Rai.

JUDGMENT :

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

1. Heard Sri Awadhesh Kumar Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rishi Kant Rai, learned counsel for respondent No. 4/Smt.Urmila Singh and Sri Abhishek Shukla, leaned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents.

2. Brief facts of the case are that plot No. 60, area 0.019 hect. Situated in village Chandanwaha, Tehsil Sadar, District Ghazipur is recorded in the name of petitioner in the revenue records vide order dated 13.10.2022. The particular of the order recording the name of the petitioner over the plot in dispute is mentioned in the remark coloumn of khatauni of 1429-1434 fasli which is annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. Against the order dated 19.01.2011, passed by the Tehsildar recording certain tenure holders over the plot in dispute, an appeal was filed by one Mahendra Pratap Singh which was allowed vide order dated 16.09.2021. The order dated 16.09.2021, allowing the appeal filed by Mahendra Pratap Singh has attained finality. The plot in dispute belongs to one Ram Sunder Singh who sold the same to Smt.Chinta Singh. Three sets of mutation proceedings have been initiated before the Tehsildar, one set of dispute was set up by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top