Back
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Jagan Nath – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Manvendraa Nath Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Amit Kumar Verma, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri R.C. Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Devendra Singh, learned counsel for respondents.
2. Present case is an outcome of consolidation proceedings and dispute is in respect of Plot Nos. 364, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370 and 371 of Khata No. 124, of Village: Dwasi, Pargana: Kulpahar, District-Hamirpur.
3. According to averments made in writ petition in basic year aforesaid plots were recorded in Khata No. 124 in the name of original respondent nos. 2 and 3. However, Pankhiya, brother of the petitioners was in continuous possession over above referred land in dispute, even before Zamindari was abolished, in his own rights as tenure-holder.
4. During consolidation proceedings, said Pankhiya filed an objection that names of original respondent nos. 2 and 3 were illegally recorded and it was alleged that they have no right, title, interest and possession over land in dispute. It was further alleged that petitioners were paying land revenue and irrigation dues throughout. It was further averred in writ petition that one Ke
Irrigation slips alone do not establish ownership or adverse possession; adequate evidence and lawful possession are required to substantiate claims over land.
Adverse possession requires continuous, open, and hostile possession, which must be proven with adequate evidence beyond mere irrigation slips.
A claim of adverse possession must demonstrate clear, hostile, and continuous possession for over 12 years, supported by genuine records; incorrect or surreptitious entries do not confer any rights.
Point Of Law: It is important to appreciate the question of intention as it would have appeared to the paper-owner. The issue is that intention of the adverse user gets communicated to the paper owne....
Point of Law : Civil Law - Possession - A party laying his claim on basis of adverse possession in some property has to prove as to date, time and manner in which possession is converted into open, h....
Right to claim title on basis of adverse possession - Any entry made on basis of adverse possession same was to be communicated to person concerned and person claiming is required to prove that it wa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the mandatory procedures for recording possession in land records and the requirements for adverse possession.
The court reaffirmed that mere revenue entries do not suffice to establish adverse possession, which requires demonstrable continuity, publicity, and intent to possess as owner, thus justifying the i....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
