SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2131

J. J. MUNIR
Rais Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Umair Mahmood.
For the Respondent: Vivek Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

J.J. MUNIR, J.

1. This application under Section 4 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Code’ for short) has been filed, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 5381 of 2023, State v. Mohd. Azeem and Others (Arising Out of Case Crime No. 233 of 2022) under Sections 4 98A, 323, 506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (‘IPC’ for short), Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (‘the Act of 1961’ for short) and Section 3 /4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 (‘the Act of 2019’ for short), Police Station Seohara, District Bijnor, pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor.

2. It may be noted at the outset that applicants Nos.1 to 6 have been charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 4 98A, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3 /4 of the Act of 1961, whereas applicant No. 7, who is the husband of the complainant-opposite party, Smt. Rukhsar, has been charge-sheeted under Sections 4 98A, 323 IPC, Section 3 /4 of the Act of 1961 and Section 3 /4 of the Act of 2019.

3. The allegation against the husband are that on 15.01.2022 at about 04:00 P.M., he pronounced a Triple Talaq, putting an end to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top