Indramani Yadav vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2118

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2118

SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Indramani Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Sameer Singh, Mr.Pawan Kumar Pandey, Mr.Shashank Singh
For the Respondent: G.A., Mr.Vikas Verma

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 2)
2. appellant's innocence and nature of allegations. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal interpretations of sc/st act regarding public view. (Para 5 , 6)
4. judicial scrutiny required for sc/st act cases. (Para 7 , 9)
5. opposition to appellant's claims. (Para 10 , 11)
6. examination of evidence and determination of public view. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. court's conclusion on judicial scrutiny and order. (Para 15 , 16)
8. final order and appeal outcome. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

Shree Prakash Singh, J.

Heard Shri Sameer Singh, Advocate assisted by Shri Shashank Singh, learned Counsel for the appellants, Shri Anirudh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.

2. This criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been filed with a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 04.02.2023 under Section 147 , 323, 326-A, 504 of IPC and 3(1)X SC/ST Act, 1989 arising out of Complaint Case No.118 of 2019 (Jagannath Vs. Sitaram & Ors.) pending before the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar and the entire criminal proceedings arising out of the aforementioned complaint case.