SHAMIM AHMED
Viresh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on malicious intent and lack of jurisdiction (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondents' defense against allegations (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal requirements under sc/st act (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. interpretation of public view in context of insult (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. summary of court's decision (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Shamim Ahmed, J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, learned AGA and perused the material available on record.
2. By means of the present appeal under Section 14A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes ( Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, 1989 the appellants have prayed for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 9.3.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Sitapur in Complaint Case No. 242 of 2019 (Smt. Prema alias Ramguni v. Rakesh Singh and others) under Section 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC and section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act and the proceedings of the said complaint case.
3. In short, the facts of the case are that Prema @ Ramguni wife of Patiram, resident of village Ram Nagar, Police Station- Ramkot, District Sitapur preferred an applic
Fiona Shrikhande v. State of Maharashtra (2013) 14 SCC 44
Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand
The judgment established the principle that for an offence under the SC/ST Act, insults or intimidations must be targeted at the victim because of their scheduled caste or tribe status, and the conte....
Assault and abuse in public view – Public view is an essential ingredient to constitute offence under Section 3(1) (s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
The court ruled that for an offence under the SC/ST Act, abuse must occur in public view, which was not established, leading to quashing of proceedings.
Mere allegations without evidence of public view do not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act unless insults target caste identity in a public context.
The court established that for an offence under the SC/ST Act to apply, there must be intent to humiliate a member of the community in a public context, supported by evidence.
For an offence under the SC/ST Act, there must be intent to humiliate based on caste identity; mere membership in a Scheduled Caste is insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.