Raksha vs State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1317

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 1317

RENU AGARWAL
Raksha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Subedar Mishra
For the Respondent: CSC, Mr.Anurag Shukla

JUDGMENT :

Renu Agarwal, J.

Heard Shri Subedar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed with the following prayers:

"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents police authorities to provide the police protection to petitioners against the respondent No.4 and his family members.

(II.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Nos.4 & 5 and his relatives for not interference in peaceful live-in-relationship of the petitioners.

(III) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the present case."

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major as per their High School Certificates and they are living in live-in-relationship. The parents of petitioner No.1 are unhappy with this relationship. It is submitted that the petitioner No.2 have lodged F.I.R. against the parents of petitioner No.1 on 15.10.2023. It is further submitted by le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document