SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1341

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA-I, JJ.
Mata Prasad and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 413 of 2001
Decided On : 07-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Arun Sinha, Ashish Raman Mishra, Maneesh Kumar Singh, Navita Sharma.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court modified the conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the lack of intent to kill and the nature of injuries inflicted.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 302, and 304 - Criminal appeal against conviction for murder - Appellants convicted under Section 302/149 I.P.C. and sentenced to life imprisonment - Appeal partly allowed; conviction modified to Section 304 Part I I.P.C. - Evidence from prosecution witnesses corroborated by medical evidence - Delay in lodging F.I.R. justified due to absence of male family members - Previous enmity established as motive for the crime. (Paras 3, 54, 56)

(B) Evidence - Witness credibility - Prosecution witnesses supported each other's statements without contradictions - Presence of independent witnesses confirmed the occurrence. (Paras 25, 30)

(C) Delay in F.I.R. - Justified due to circumstances surrounding the incident and absence of male members in the family. (Paras 37, 39)

(D) Medical Evidence - Postmortem report corroborated ocular evidence, confirming cause of death as shock and hemorrhage from antemortem injuries. (Paras 41, 46) (E) Conviction - Conviction under Section 302 modified to Section 304 Part I based on the nature of injuries and intent. (Paras 51, 54)

JUDGMENT :

ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

2. During the course of hearing of this appeal, the appellant nos. 1 and 2 namely Mata Prasad and Bhurey @ Dinesh Kumar have died and the appeal insofar as it relates to them has been abated vide order dated 11.7.2023 and 16.8.2023 respectively. Thus, the appeal survives on behalf of these appellants namely Pappu, Puttan and Daddan (appellant nos. 3, 4 and 5) only.

(A) Prelude

3. By means of this criminal appeal, the appellants, out of whom, only appellant nos. 3, 4 and 5 (hereinafter referred to as appellants) survive have challenged the judgment and order dated 26.5.2001 by which learned Sessions Judge, Bahraich in sessions trial no. 25 of 1999 arising out of case crime no. 318 of 1998, under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 I.P.C. police station Ikauna, district Shrawasti has convicted them under Sections 302/149 I.P.C, and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a stipulation of fine of Rs.5000/- each and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years in default of payment of fine. In addition, appellants namely Pappu, Puttan and Daddan were also convicted under Section 147 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo one year's R.I. with stipulation of fine of Rs. 500/- each. In default of payment of fine a further R.I. of three months. All the sentences are directed to run concurrently.

4. The prosecution case, in nutshell, is that the complainant namely Smt. Meera Devi submitted a tahrir (exhibit ka-1) on 23.9.1998 at 10.00 p.m. in the police station alleging therein that on 23.9.1998 at 5.30 p.m. the accused appellants namely Mata Prasad armed with pharsa, Bhoorey alias Dinesh Kumar armed with ballam and rest of the accused namely Pappu, Puttan and Dadan armed with lathis were sitting near the 'Dhabli' of one Nankoo Tiwari and while her father-in-law was going to his agricultural field from his house they all started assaulting him and dragged him to the door of Chhotkau Kurmi where they again assaulted him with lathi, ballam and pharsa. The complainant on hearing the scream reached at the place of occurrence. The other persons namely Nand Kumar, Mahipal and several villagers also reached there. On being reprimanded by theses persons, the accused appellants ran away from the spot. The complainant with the help of villagers brought the deceased at the door of Kailash Nath Pradhan where he succumbed to the injuries. The report of the incident was registered as case crime no. 318 of 1998, under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 I.P.C. at police station Ikauna, district Shrawasti and was entered in the G.D. No. 32(Exhibit ka-3).

5. Inquest report of the dead body was prepared by the Investigating Officer (PW-4) and the postmortem was conducted by PW-6 who noted the following antemortem injuries on the body of the deceased:

    (i) Larger abraded contusion on right outer front of abdomen and adjacent part of back size 26 cm x 12.5 c.m.

On opening abdominal cavity about 2 litres of blood found.

Liver raptured

(ii) 3 cm X 1.5 cm abraded contusion left side forehead just about left eyebrow.

(iii) 1.5 cm incised wound mid-part of back of left forearm.

(iv) 8.0 c.m. x 6.0 cm contusion dorsum of right hand, on deeper dissection, outer three metacorpals found fractured.

(v) 7.00 cm x 5.5 cm contusion dorsum of left hand

(vi) Larger abraided contusion over back and sides of lower half of right upper arm and uper half of right forearm. Size 28.0 cm X 8.0 cm on deeper dissection right humerous fractured near lower end.

(vii) Incised wound size 1.5 cm X 0.5 cm outer side right arm lower part 7 cm above the elbow joint.

(viii) 7.5 Incised would front of left leg 12.0 c. above the ankle joint

(ix) 4.0 cm. incised wound front of right leg 13 cm above the ankle joint.

(x) 3.5 cm long incised wound inner side right foot 7 cm in front of medial malleolus.

In the opinion of the doctor deceased died due to shock

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top