RAJNISH KUMAR
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Thru. Manager Legal Hub, Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
Shallo Begum – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajnish Kumar, J.
1. Heard Shri Jitendra Narain Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant in F.A.F.O. No.333 of 2023 and learned counsel for the respondent no.3 in F.A.F.O. No.18 of 2023 (here-in-after referred as learned counsel for the insurance company) and Shri R.K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the claimant-respondents no.1 to 3 in F.A.F.O. No.333 of 2023 and learned counsel for the appellant in F.A.F.O. No.18 of 2023 (here-in-after referred as learned counsel for the claimants). None appeared on behalf of the respondent nos.4 and 5 in F.A.F.O. No.333 of 2023 and for respondent nos.1 and 2 in F.A.F.O. No. 18 of 2023 i.e. the owner and driver of the offending vehicle i.e. truck.
2. The F.A.F.O. No.333 of 2023 has been filed assailing the judgment and award dated 16.09.2022 passed in Claim Petition No.953 of 2014; Smt. Shallo Begum and Others Vs. Mahendra Singh and Others by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (here-in-after referred as M.A.C.T.), South, Lucknow. The F.A.F.O. No.18 of 2023 has been filed for modification of the judgment and award dated 16.09.2022and enhancement of compensation. Hence both the appeals are being clubbed and decided together by this common judg
Dinesh Kumar J. @ Dinesh J. Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Others
Divisional Controller, KSRTC Vs. Mahadev Shetty & Another
Gobald Motor Service Ltd. & Another Vs. R.M.K. Veluswami & Others
Khub Chand and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Mannat Johal & Others
National Insurance company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Shethi & Others
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pushpa Rana & Others
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Rekhaben & Others
Sanjay Ramdas Patil Vs. Sanjay & Others
Sebastiani Lakra and Others Vs. National Insurance Company Limited and Another
Sebastiani Lakra & Others Vs. National Insurance company Ltd. & another
The court affirmed that compensation for loss of life must be just and adequate, emphasizing that benefits from compassionate appointments do not offset the loss of future earnings.
The court reinforced that all allowances must be included in calculating income for compensation, and compassionate appointments should not affect future earnings claims under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court affirmed the principle that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just and fair, emphasizing the need to consider future prospects and proper income tax deductions.
Point of Law : Motor Vehicle - Accident - seeking enhancement of the award amount - Liability of insurance company - since the Insurance Appeal was mostly involving an attempt to reduce the compensat....
Compensation for vehicular accidents must be just and reasonable, focusing on equitable loss recovery, while applying correct legal principles without succumbing to strict technicalities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's duty to award just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account recent legal developments and the power of the Court ....
Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must consider gross income without arbitrary deductions and allow future prospects based on statutory guidelines, ensuring just compensation for victims' dep....
The court affirmed that the insurance company is liable for compensation when the driver, even if related to the owner, was covered under the policy, emphasizing the principle of just compensation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.