NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
State – Appellant
Versus
Shivakant Bajpai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Ref: Criminal Misc. Application (Leave to Appeal)
1. The present government appeal under Section 378 (3) Cr.P.C. has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 25.4.2023 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Northern Railway, Bareilly in Criminal Case No. 592 of 2013, arising out of Case Crime No. 101 of 2013 under Sections 154 and 174 of the Railways Act, 1989, Police Station R.P.F. Post Shahjahanpur, Moradabad Division, Northern Railway whereby accused-respondent was acquitted.
2. Heard Shri Alok Ranjan Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Government of India at length. None is present for the accused-respondent.
3. The prosecution story, in nutshell, is that boom lock post of the Railway Department was broken by a Truck bearing Registration No. UP-26-9171 being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and the driver of the said Truck fled away from the place of occurrence but the Truck was taken into possession by the police. F.I.R. as Case Crime No. 101 of 2013 under Sections 154 and 174 of the Railways Act, 1989 was lodged. After investigation, the police report was submitted to the court for
Atley v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1955 CrLJ 1653
Bannareddy v. State of Karnataka
Balakishan A. Devidayal vs. State of Maharashtra
Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Mohan alias Srinivas alias Seena alias Tailor Seena vs. State of Karnataka
Pakkirisamy vs. State of T.N. (1997) 8 SCC 158
Ramesh Babulal Doshi vs. State of Gujarat
The appellate court upheld the presumption of innocence and emphasized the need for corroborative evidence for confessions made to R.P.F. officials, affirming the trial court's acquittal due to insuf....
The presumption of innocence in criminal law reinforces the burden on prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; acquittals cannot be disturbed without compelling evidence.
Extra-judicial confessions are weak evidence requiring corroboration and should be credible; reliance on insufficient evidence led to the appellant's acquittal.
For a conviction based on extra-judicial confession, corroborative evidence is essential, and any substantial contradictions in testimonies undermine its reliability.
Extra-judicial confessions made in police presence are inadmissible if not proven voluntary, requiring solid evidence for circumstantial convictions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.