IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Sangeeta Chandra, Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, JJ.
Jaimangal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 548 of 2002
Decided On : 08-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against conviction details (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. investigation and evidence collection (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. trial court proceedings overview (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. appellant's arguments against conviction (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. prosecution's reliance on evidence (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. inconsistencies in testimonies (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. problems with extra-judicial confession and medical evidence (Para 34 , 35 , 37 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. final judgment and acquittal (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT :
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J.
1. Heard Shri Abhineet Jaiswal, learned Amicus for the appellant as well as Smt. Meera Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-respondent and perused the record.
2. This criminal appeal has been preferred by appellant-Jaimangal Yadav under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 8.03.2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gonda in Session Trial No. 272/96 ( State Vs. Jaymangal Yadav ) arising out of Case Crime No. 154 of 1996, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, Gonda, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and has been sentenced with rigorous life imprisonment, and fine of Rs. 3000/- and in default of fine to further undergo for three months rigorous imprisonment.
3. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the instant appeal are that the informant, namely, Bhagwan Prasad has lodged a First Information Report at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda alleging that he is a resident of Karnailganj, Gonda and is having his Coal Depot at Faizabad by-pass in the vicinity of village Budhai Purwa in the name of Saket Coal Traders where deceased Bhagwati Prasad Tiwari was working as clerk and appellant Jaimangal Yadav was employed as Chaukidar pertaining to the incident occurred on 29.2.1996 at about 6.30 a.m.
4. It is further stated that on 29.2.96 he along with Shiv Shankar Tiwari and Shiv Bhagwan, after attending a B.D.C. Meeting, came to his Coal Depot and found his clerk Bhagwati Prasad Tiwari dead as he has been assaulted brutally on his head and thereafter he launched a search for appellant Jaimangal Yadav and he was found in the 'Arhar Field' situated nearby and after seeing the informant and his associates he started fleeing but was overpowered and apprehended and thereafter he confessed his guilt in terms that the deceased had levelled false allegation of theft against him and had not paid him his dues, so today at about 6.00 a.m. he assaulted the deceased with 'sabbal' on his head whereby he died and hid himself in the Arhar Field. It is also stated by the informant that he has tied the appellant with a rope at his coal depot and has come to lodge the FIR.
5. On the basis of the aforesaid written information an FIR in case Crime No. 154/1996 under Section 302 IPC was registered at Kotwali Nagar, Gonda and the investigation was entrusted to S.S.I. Shri Deepchand Tiwari.
6. The Investigating Officer arrived at the scene of the crime and prepared the inquest report and took the appellant in custody. Appellant while in the custody of police confessed his guilt before the Investigating Officer and there after on his pointing out a blood stained 'Sabbal' was recovered from the heap of coal situated nearby.
7. The Investigating Officer after completion of necessary paper work sent the dead body of the deceased for postmortem and the postmortem of the deceased was conducted by the Dr. C.M.R. Singh on 1.3.1996 at 4.05 P.M. The age of the deceased was found about 35 years. The rigor mortis was present in his whole body and following injuries were noted on his person:-
(i) Lacerated wound 3c.m. x 0.5c.m. Skull cavity deep, on left side of forehead 1.5 c.m. above left eye brow.
(ii) Lacerated wound 2 c.m. x 1 c.m. x skull cavity deep on the left forehead just above left eye brow.
(iii) Lacerated wound 4.5 c.m. x 1.5 c.m. x skull cavity deep on left side of head, 1.5 c.m. above injury no.2.
(iv) Incised wound 2 c.m. x 0.5 c
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sunil and Another
Lal Mohammad Manjur Ansari Vs. State of Gujarat
Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Sahadevan and another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Raja Naykar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Extra-judicial confessions are weak evidence requiring corroboration and should be credible; reliance on insufficient evidence led to the appellant's acquittal.
For a conviction based on extra-judicial confession, corroborative evidence is essential, and any substantial contradictions in testimonies undermine its reliability.
The convicting based solely on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confessions requires corroborative proof and must adhere to well-established principles regarding such evidence.
Extra-judicial confessions made in police presence are inadmissible if not proven voluntary, requiring solid evidence for circumstantial convictions.
The judgment emphasizes the requirement for complete and unimpeachable evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a case of circumstantial evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that extra judicial confession and recovery of evidence are weak pieces of evidence and must inspire confidence. The prosecution must establish a c....
The prosecution must establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in murder cases, and rely on corroborative evidence for extra-judicial confessions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.