MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Tejbir Gulati – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. De-link the Application U/S 482 No. 16593 of 2019 (Tejbir Gulati Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another) from the present application.
2. Heard Mr. Sudeep Harkauli, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned AGA-I for the State
3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 20.02.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-I, Ghaziabad in Criminal Revision No. 176/2019 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 307, 406, 376, 511 IPC & 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Ghaziabad.
4. Brief facts of the case are that an FIR was lodged by Navneet Kumar-opposite party no. 2 against the applicant (husband) and other family members on 17.08.2018 with the allegations that the opposite party no. 2 was mentally and physically harassed for additional dowry demand by the applicant as well as other family members. It has been further alleged that opposite party no. 2 was married with the applicant on 30.05.2003 according to Hindu rites and rituals. The family of the opposite party no. 2 gave dowry an
Amit Kapoor Vs. Ramesh Chander and another
Binay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar (1997) 1 SCC 283
Krishan Kumar Malik Vs. State of Haryana
Mohd. Imran Khan Vs. State Government (NCT Of Delhi) (2011) 10 SCC 192
The court upheld the revisional court's order, emphasizing the significance of the victim's testimony in dowry harassment and rape cases, and affirmed the legal validity of the summoning order.
At discharge stage, material contradictions in prosecutrix statements, lack of medical corroboration, and inconsistent theft allegations justify discharge if no prima facie case, preventing abuse of ....
The court can base conviction on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if it inspires confidence, but her testimony must be of sterling quality and free from contradictions and inconsistencies.
The sole testimony of a victim in rape cases must inspire confidence and be consistent; significant inconsistencies can lead to acquittal.
In cases under Section 498A IPC, the Magistrate should consider the factors laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation before issuing a warrant of arres....
Credible testimony of the victim can support a conviction if it is reliable, yet inconsistencies and lack of corroboration undermine allegations of sexual assault, leading to acquittal.
Dowry Death - Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of offence - It is true that summoning of an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. cannot be resorted to in a cavalier or casua....
The main legal point established is the requirement of grave suspicion to frame charges, the significance of tower locations and call detail records in establishing presence, and the importance of as....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.