Back
RAJAN ROY, AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA I
Gore Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the murder and prior animosity (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. medical evidence confirms the cause of death (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding witness credibility and timelines (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 21) |
| 4. appellants argue unreliability of testimony due to delayed witness statements. (Para 26) |
| 5. conviction based on evidence and witness statements (Para 30 , 31) |
| 6. final orders and directives by the court (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Rajan Roy, J.
Heard Sri B.M. Sahai, learned counsel for the appellant nos.3, 6, 8 & 10 and Sri Umesh Chandra Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This is an appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 26.07.1986 passed by Special Judge, Unnao in Session Trial No.261/1984 lodged at P.S.-Asiwan, District-Unnao sentencing each of the appellants to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 read with Section149 I.P.C. and two years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 I.P.C.
3. Out of the ten appellants who had filed this appeal only appellant nos.3, 6, 8 & 10 are alive. The appeal with regard to others has already been dismissed as abated.
4. It is a case of double murder.
5. The case of prosecution i
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on credible evidence, including witness testimony and medical findings, even absent direct physical evidence like weapon recovery.
The conviction of the appellants for double murder was upheld as the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible witness testimonies and medical evidence, despite the absence of....
Interested evidence is not necessarily unreliable and should be scrutinized with care but cannot be rejected merely on the ground of being partisan. Minor discrepancies and contradictions should not ....
The court upheld the conviction for murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, emphasizing the need for extreme caution in imposing capital punishment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on trustworthy and reliable testimony of prosecution witnesses, despite their relationship to the deceased, to establish the guilt of ....
The court acquitted the appellants due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies in witness testimonies, emphasizing the need for credible proof in criminal convictions.
The prosecution bears the burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and significant inconsistencies in witness testimony can lead to the acquittal of the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
