SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2531

AJAY BHANOT
Shree Agrawal Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rishi Raj Kapoor.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. denial of statutory right through government inaction. (Para 2 , 3)
2. inconsistency in court interim orders. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. pre-deposit requirements for tax disputes vary. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. need for consistency in judicial decisions. (Para 15 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. final order requires 20% deposit for stay. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Ajay Bhanot, J.

Order in Interim Application

Heard Shri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents- State.

2. Shri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the ingredients of Section 74 of the U.P.GST Act, 2017 are not made out from the show cause notice as well as orders passed by the revenue authorities as prerequisites of Section 74 of the U.P.GST Act are not satisfied.

3. The petitioner has assailed the order passed by the first appellate authority under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act. The second appeal lies before the appellate tribunal under Section 112 of the Act. The appellate tribunal has not been made functional till date though it is informed that the notification has been m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top