SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JAYANT BANERJI
Apex Leather – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the GST Council, New Delhi through its Member Secretary is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No. 5.
2. Notice on behalf of respondent No. 5 has been accepted by the office of learned Additional Solicitor General.
3. Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.P. Singh Kachhwah, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Sri Amit Mahajan, learned Senior Standing Counsel - (Indirect Taxes) for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and Sri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
4. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the petitioner filed refund application under Section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017/U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Acts, 2017") in form GST-RFD-01 on 31.3.2020 for which an acknowledge receipt in RFD-02 was issued by the respondents on 9.4.2020. The refund application of the petitioner was rejected by the proper officer by order dated 29.4.2020 in form GST-RFD-06. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order dated 29.4.2020, the petitioner filed an appeal before the respondent N
Health for Millions vs. Union of India
Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil vs. State of Maharashtra
Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund vs. Kartick Das
Malik Brothers vs. Narendra Dadhich and Others
Sachidananda Pandey vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Union of India vs. Cipla Ltd. (2017) 5 SCC 262
Union of India and Another vs. Cynamide India Ltd. and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.