SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2473

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, VINOD DIWAKAR
Delhivery Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shubham Agrawal.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. petition against gst order regarding ownership of goods. (Para 1)
2. arguments on the right to appeal against gst order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's acknowledgment of legal standing for cosigner/consignee. (Para 4)
4. writ petition dismissed, appeal permissible. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.

This petition is directed against an order passed by the department under Section 129 (3) of GST Act, dated 26.02.2023, addressed to one Ajay Yadav. This order is assailed on the ground that the goods in question belong to the petitioner. Submission is that though all other documents required for the transit of goods were accompanied, yet the vehicle's number was wrongly recorded in the transit document, inadvertently, on account of which the impugned action is initiated.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order impugned has been passed against the driver, it would not be open for the cosigner or the consignee to challenge such order before the appropriate forum. It is otherwise not disputed that the impugned order is appealable under the statute.

3. On the other hand, Learned Standing Counsel submits that the cosigner or the consignee can al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top