SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2507

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Juneja Poultry Products Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Uma Nath Pandey, Suresh Chandra Varma.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. S.C. Varma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J.N. Maurya, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents assisted by Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The instant petition has been filed for following relief:-

    "I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.4 not to give effect of the order dated 26.04.2023 passed in Case No.7799 of 2022 Computerised Case No. T202203410407799 (State of U.P. v. Juneja Poultry Products Pvt. Ltd.) under Section 166 and 167 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 by which direction has been issued to vest 10.5764 Hectare petitioner's land in State Government due to violation of section 154(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 during the pendency of the Appeal no.1113 of 2023 (Juneja Poultry Products Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. and others) pending before the Commissioner, Kanpur Division Kanpur.

    I-A) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 25.10.2023 (Annexure No.22 to this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top