Rajesh Swaroop @ Anil Patel vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2203

DEEPAK VERMA
Rajesh Swaroop @ Anil Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For Applicant : Ajay Kumar Mishra, Counsel.
For Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Verma, J.

Supplementary affidavit, filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.288 of 2022, under Sections 274 , 275, 276, 419, 420 IPC. and Section 102 , 103 TRADE MARKS ACT , 1958 and 18A Drugs and Cosmetics Act, P.S. Nauchandi, District Meerut, during pendency of the trial.

4. It is alleged in the FIR that police informant on 2.9.2022 received information from informer that some accused persons engaged in selling duplicate medicines when informant arrested accused persons they recovered 50 packets J.J. Ultracet medicines B.NON 1939 G MFD 09/21 Expiry 08/23 from co-accused Sachin Sharma @ Gaurav Sharma and recovered 25 packets of J.J. Ultracet medicines B.NO N 1939 MFD 09/21 Expiry 08/23 from the accused-applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and as per the report dated 10.2.2023 Certificate of Test and Analyst by Government Analyst under Section 25(1) of Drug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document