SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2520

AJIT SINGH
Raghvendra Singh Alias Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Applicant : Ray Sahab Yadav, Counsel.
For Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Ajit Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

2. This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No.253 of 2022, under Sections 419 , 420, 467, 468, 471, 274, 275, 34 IPC. and section 18 (a) (i), 18 (c) and 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act, Police Station Kotwali, district Prayagraj.

3. The first information report of this incident was lodged by the complainant against the present accused and others and it was mentioned in the FIR that on 21.10.2022 the first informant along with other police personnel were present at Swarooprani Medical College then the police informer has informed that some persons were doing work of selling and buying fake platelets and thereafter they raided and arrested ten accused persons, in which two persons had fled away. It is further mentioned that from the possession of the applicant, six pouch plasma, three pouch platelets, one Samsung phone and one phone of Realme of black colour were recovered.

4. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top