SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2012

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, DONADI RAMESH
S. S. Suppliers – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashish Bansal and Niraj Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri. Niraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner-assessee and Sri. Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue.

2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 17.03.2023 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 74(9) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Primarily, it has been submitted, the above order was preceded by show-cause notice dated 01.10.2022 and a reminder notice dated 26.12.2022. However, neither that notice disclosed to the petitioner - the date, time or venue of personal hearing. In such circumstances, it has been vehemently urged, the impugned order has been passed in violation of Section 75(4) of the Act.

3. The above aspect has been considered by a coordinate bench of this Court in M/S Mohini Traders v. State of U.P. & Anr. (Writ Tax No. 551 of 2023); Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:115008-DB as also in Mahaveer Trading Company v. Deputy Commissioner State Tax & Anr. (Writ Tax No. 303 of 2024); Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:38820-DB.

4. In view of the facts noted above and the earlier decisions of the Court, no useful purpose may be served in keeping the present petition pending or calling for a counter affi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top