SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2198

JASPREET SINGH
Ram Kumar Chaurasiya – Appellant
Versus
Genda – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Anurag Shukla.
For the Respondent: Asit Srivastava, Ved Prakash.

Table of Content
1. background facts of the accident and claim. (Para 2 , 18 , 19 , 20)
2. appellant's arguments against involvement and liability. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 12)
3. court's evaluation of evidence and trial standard. (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 31)
4. legal standards of proof in motor accident claims. (Para 25 , 27 , 39)
5. final dismissal of the appeal and directive for compensation. (Para 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT

Jaspreet Singh, J.

Heard Sri Anurag Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants. None has put in appearance on behalf of the claimant-respondent nos. 1 to 5, however, Sri Asit Srivastava, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 6.

2. The instant appeal has been preferred under section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 assailing the award dated 19.12.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 4, Hardoi in Claim Petition No. 282 of 2002 whereby in a death case a sum of Rs. 1,53,250/- along with 6% interest has been awarded in favour of the claimants-respondents with a direction that the award would be satisfied by the Insurance Company who would have a right to recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. It is in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top