SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 183

K. J. THAKER
Maya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ramesh Singh
For the Respondent: C.S. Chaturvedi

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Ramesh Singh, learned counsel for the appellants; Shri C.S. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondents; and perused the record.

2. This appeal, at the behest of the claimants, challenges the judgment dated 18.3.1992 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/XIth Additional District Judge, Agra (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.150 of 1987 rejecting the same and not awarding any compensation.

3. The brief facts as culled out from the record are that the deceased met with an accident on 12.3.1987 at about 09.40 hrs. The informant alongwith the deceased was going towards the Agra City, i.e., Agra Fort and the alleged Jeep and the Scooter were coming fro m the Agra City, i.e., Agra Fort. On notice being issued, the Insurance company appeared and filed their reply. The driver and owner accepted the accident having taken place but contended that the accident occurred due to negligence of the deceased herein.

4. Learned Counsel Sri Ramesh Singh has contended that the petition has been dismissed by assigning reasons whi

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top