SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2325

JAYANT BANERJI
Jokhai – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Akhila Nand Pandey, Suresh Chandra Varma
For the Respondent: C.S.C., K.P. Verma, R. B. Tripathi, Sri.R.K. Tripathi

JUDGMENT

Jayant Banerji, J.

Heard Sri S.C. Varma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri O.P. Sharma, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 and Sri R.B. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 5 to 9.

2. As is evident from the order dated 14.7.2021, Sri K.P. Verma, learned counsel represents respondent no.4, however, despite the list being revised, he has not appeared.

3. This writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the judgment and order dated 8.4.2021, passed by the Board of Revenue and the order dated 30.6.2016, passed by the respondent no.2, Sub Divisional Officer, Bhadohi.

4. It is noticed that despite time being granted to the Standing Counsel, appearing for the State and to the counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha, no counter affidavit has been filed.

5. It is stated in the writ petition that with respect to Plot No.80, area 0-18-1 bighas and Plot No.81 area 0-15-3 bighas situate in Mauja Rudrapur Taluka Chauthar, Pargana, Tehsil and District Bhadohi, the entry was in the name of the father of the petitioners and after their father's death, the names of the petitioners have continued uninterruptedly for for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top