SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2316

KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR
Ragini Srivasatva – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ankit Mishra,Mohd. Ali.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.

Heard Shri Mohd. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent/State.

Prayer

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers: -

    "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to release and make payment of entire retiral benefits of the petitioner's deceased husband Late Ram Kumar Srivastava, which includes amount of Death Gratuity, leave encashment, G.P.F., G.I.S., arrear of salary in revised pay scale of the deceased fallen due with effect from 1.1.2006 to 5.10.2008 and family pension to the petitioner with effect from 6.10.2008 together with its arrears along with interest @ 12% per annum;

    (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay penal interest @ 12% per annum or an amount as may be quantified by this Hon'ble Court over the entire pending amount of the petitioner's deceased husband, Late Ram Kumar Srivastava due to arbitrary and illegally withholding the dues and creat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top