SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2307

K. J. THAKER
Sushma Devi – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants : Rakesh Kumar Porwal
For the Respondents: Anand Kumar Sinha

JUDGMENT

Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.

Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Porwal, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Anand Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company and perused the judgment and order impugned.

2. Both these appeals challenges the judgment and award dated 31.8.1998 passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/VII Additional District Judge, Etawah in M.A.C. No. 353 of 1994 (Sushma Devi and another v. Om Prakash Gupta and others) & M.A.C. No.354 of 1994 (Rameshwari Devi and others v. Om Prakash Gupta and others).

3. F.A.F.O. No.1287 of 1998 has been filed against the Claim Petition No. 353 of 1998 whereby the Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs. 1,35,000/- to the respondent-claimants with interest at the rate of 12%. F.A.F.O. No. 1178 of 1998 has been filed against claim petition No. 354 of 1993 which was dismissed in terms of amount awarded under no fault liability.

4. A very fanciful argument in the rejoinder has been raised by Sri R.K. Porwal which is only raised for being rejected outright. The claim petition was under Section 140 & 166 of MOTOR VEHICLES ACT . It is submitted by Sri Porwal that the claim petition should be considered under Section 163A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top