SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1817

MOHD. FAIZ ALAM KHAN
Abhay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Anuj Pandey, Anand Kumar Yadav, Ashish Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J.

Heard Mr. Anuj Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, as well as Shri. Rajesh Singh, learned A.G.A., for the State, and perused the record, including the case diary.

2. The applicants, by means of the instant application under Section 482 CrPC, have challenged the order dated 21.12.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Small Causes/Special Court, MPMLA, Ayodhya in Case No.879 of 2023, arising out of case crime no.0471 of 2017, under Sections 188 IPC read with Sections 126-A and 127 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 lodged at police station Gosaiganj, district Faizabad (now Ayodhya), copy of which is contained in Annexure-6 to the application.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the FIR with false and concocted allegations has been filed by the informant against the applicants, without there being any cogent material or evidence and after investigation charge-sheet has also been filed. However, the applicants have challenged the charge-sheet and the summoning order passed by the trial court dated 17.12.2022 and also the entire proceedings of the case before this court by filing an application under section 482 CrPC No.383 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top