SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2838

PANKAJ BHATIA
S/S S. K. Trading Co – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner Grade 2(Appeal ) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Bipin Kumar Pandey,Aditya Pandey.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhatia, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the allegations that petitioner no.1 placed an order for supply of mixed ready-made garments, which were being transported by petitioner no.2. It is stated that on 13.09.2022 the goods while in transit were intercepted and a physical verification report was prepared on 17.09.2022 in form GST MOV-04 and no discrepancy was found in the quantity of the goods in question.

3. It is stated that on 21.09.2022, a detention order was passed detaining the goods in question mainly on the ground that the goods were without E-Way bill. It is argued that although under Section 129 (3) of U.P. GST Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), there is a prescription for issuance of a notice in Form GST MOV-07, however, the notice was not issued in the format as prescribed but was issued by an authority whose name is not even specified as the order itself recorded that the same was issued for the authority and not by the authority.

4. It is stated that in reply to the letter issued to the petitioner, the petitioner filed a det

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top