IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
Prof. Prahlad Kumar - Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. and another - Opposite Party
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 NO. - 37828 OF 2016.
Decided On : 23-02-2024
JUDGMENT
Prashant Kumar, J.
Heard Sri. Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri. Aishwarya Pratap Singh and Sri. Avaneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and Sri. S.D. Pandey and Sri. S.K. Chandraul, learned A.G.A.s for the State-O.P. No.1.
2. This is a case where a Professor had to pay a very heavy price for asking an Assistant Professor to take classes and teach properly. He was made an accused in a frivolous and malicious criminal case and had to face trial for last eight years, and further had to face humiliation, stigma, for no fault of his own, and on the other hand, the complainant, by misusing the provisions of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred as 'the S.C./S.T. Act'), had been using as a weapon and threatened the other seniors from taking any action against her.
3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant praying for quashing charge sheet dated 08.10.2016 under Section 354C, 504, 506 of IPC and under Section 3(2) (va) of the S.C./S.T. Act as well as entire proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.127 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No.701 of 2016, Police Station-Colonelganj, District-Allahabad pending in the Court of Special judge, SC/ST Act, Allahabad.
Factual Matrix
4. The facts of the case in brief are that O.P. no.2 namely, Deep Shikha Sonkar has joined as Assistant Professor in Department of Economics in University of Allahabad in July, 2013 and at that time, Professor Jagdish Narain was the then Head of Department. Thereafter, the present applicant took charge as the Head of Department of Economics on 14.02.2014. On 05.01.2015, the then Dean, Faculty of Commerce, Professor Jagdish Narayan prepared a report with respect to newly appointed teachers for the period commencing from May, 2013 to February, 2014. In the said report, in respect of O.P. no.2 it was mentioned as follows:
| Name | Work | Conduct | Behaviour |
| Ms. Deepshikha Sonker | Less satisfactory | Rude | Not Good |
5. Being annoyed with the aforesaid, O.P. no.2 filed multiple complaints as mentioned hereunder:
1st Complaint
2nd Complaint
3rd Complaint
4th Complaint
6. On 16.02.2016 the applicant relinquished the office of the Head of Department for Economics as the Head of Department by rotation for two years as per prevalent norms of University of Allahab
Dr. BuddhiKota Subbarao v. K. Parasarn
Fiona Shrikhande v. State of Maharashtra AIR 2014 SC 957
Sivamoorthy v. University of Madras
State of Punjab v. Bhajan Singh
Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra
The misuse of the S.C./S.T. Act for personal grievances is impermissible, and allegations must substantiate a prima facie case to avoid abuse of legal processes.
The court ruled that allegations under the SC/ST Act and IPC were false and motivated by personal vendetta, emphasizing the need to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
The burden of proof in a criminal proceeding is different from that in a departmental proceeding. The court must treat complainants of sexual harassment and assault sensitively and ensure a fair tria....
Disciplinary proceedings under service rules are not 'other legal proceedings' under Section 3(1)(p) of Atrocities Act; mere knowledge of Scheduled Caste status insufficient without proof of caste-ba....
The court established that specific allegations under the SC/ST Act must be evident in initial complaints for charges to be actionable, and mere improvements in subsequent statements cannot justify f....
The court quashed the FIR against the petitioner, finding no evidence of sexual harassment or conspiracy, emphasizing the lack of mens rea and the frivolous nature of the allegations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific details and the need for the insult or intimidation to be made in a place within public view to establish a prima faci....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to prevent the misuse of the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and to discourage dis....
The court quashed proceedings under the SC/ST Act due to lack of public view in the alleged incident, emphasizing the need for specific ingredients to establish the offence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.