Back
RAJEEV MISRA
Pavitra Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Misra, J.
Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar Upadhyay, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents-1,2,3,4 and Mr. Ram Chandra Kushwaha, the leaned counsel for respondent-5.
2. Perused the record.
3. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 24.10.2016, passed by respondetn-3- Tehsildar, Tehsil Rampur Maniharan, District- Saharanpur (Annexure-5 to the writ petition), the order dated 28.10.2016, passed by respondent-4- Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Rampur, Maniharan, District Saharanpur (Annexure-4 to the writ petition), the order dated 26.3.2018, passed by respondent-4 Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Rampur, Maniharan, District Saharanpur (Annexure-3 to the writ petition), the order dated 13.8.2020, passed by respondent 2,- Additional Commissioner (Admin)-II, Saharanpur (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) and the order dated 4.10.2023, passed by respondent-2,- Additional Commissioner (Admin)-II, Saharanpur (Annexure-1 to the writ petition).
4. Record shows that a registered sale deed 2.1.2014 was executed by petitioner in favour of respondent-5, Sandeep Kumar. On the basis of aforesaid sale deed, respondent-5 claimed mutation. He accordingly filed
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act are summary in nature and do not determine title; a registered sale deed remains valid until annulled by a competent court.
The mutation application based on an unchallenged sale deed cannot be dismissed in summary proceedings, affirming the Board of Revenue's review authority under the U.P. Land Revenue Act.
Writ petitions against mutation orders are maintainable if they violate natural justice or are issued without jurisdiction, reaffirming the need for proper procedural adherence in land revenue matter....
Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes in mutation cases; established rights remain intact despite challenges.
Complicated inheritance disputes regarding land rights should be resolved through regular civil suits, not summary mutation proceedings, as determined under applicable land laws.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to civil suits for declaration of rights.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to the outcome of civil suits regarding property rights.
Mutation proceedings do not confer title, and substantive rights must be established in a competent civil court.
Mutation orders require evidence of possession through lawful transfer, and failure to consider possession invalidates such orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
