SAURABH LAVANIA
Shailendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Commissioner admin. Ayodhya Div. Ayodhya – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Lavania, J.
Heard petitioner No.1/Shailendra Singh, who appeared in person for himself and also for petitioner No.2, 3, 4, 5 & 6, Sri. Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State counsel and Shri. Uma Shankar Sahai, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.3 to 7.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:-
Aligarh Municipal Board v. Ekka Tonga Mazdoor Union
Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (D) By Lrs.
Bhagat Ram (Dead) By Lrs v. Teja Singh (Dead) By Lrs.
Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co.
Government of A. P. v. Gudepu Sailoo
Hansraj Tirathram v. Administrator, Municipality Jammu
Homi Rustom G. Pardiawala v. Sub-Inspector Baig
Ishwar Dutt v. Collector (LA) (2005) 7 SCC 190 : AIR 2005 SC 3165
Kalyan Singh Chouhan v. C.P. Joshi (2011) 11 SCC 786 : (2011) 4 SCC (Civ) 656 : AIR 2011 SC 1127
Kartar Singh v. Harjinder Singh
M.V.S. Mkantkayala Rao v. M. Narasimhaswami
Mool Chand Yadav v. Raza Buland Sugar Company Limited Rampur
Mulraj v. Murti Raghunathji Maharaj
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad v. State of Maharashtra
Om Prakash Gupta v. Ranbir B. Goyal (2002) 2 SCC 256 : AIR 2002 SC 665
Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar
Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K
S. Abdul Karim v. M. K. Prakash
Sidheshwar Mukharjee v. Bhubneshwar Prasad Narain Singh
State of Bihar v. Rani Sonabati Kumari
Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner
Surajit Singh v. Harbans Singh
T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha
Tayabbhai M. Bagasarwalla v. Hind Rubber Industries Put. Ltd.
Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes in mutation cases; established rights remain intact despite challenges.
The mutation application based on an unchallenged sale deed cannot be dismissed in summary proceedings, affirming the Board of Revenue's review authority under the U.P. Land Revenue Act.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act are summary in nature and do not determine title; a registered sale deed remains valid until annulled by a competent court.
Writ petitions against mutation orders are maintainable if they violate natural justice or are issued without jurisdiction, reaffirming the need for proper procedural adherence in land revenue matter....
Mutation orders require evidence of possession through lawful transfer, and failure to consider possession invalidates such orders.
Revenue authorities must effect mutation based on registered civil court consent decrees without adjudicating title, probate, prohibitory orders, or registration issues, as proceedings are fiscal onl....
Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title, probate or decree validity in mutation proceedings; must effect mutation on registered civil decrees for fiscal purposes unless set aside by competent cou....
Jurisdiction of revenue authorities to issue mutation orders upheld when confirmed ownership certificates exist, superseding prior claims based on disputed titles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.