SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2814

RAJEEV MISRA
Ramkesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Sunil Kumar Dubey
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Rajiv Sisodia

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Misra, J.

Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Rajiv Sisodia, the learned counsel representing first informant.

2. Perused the record.

3. This application for bail has been filed by applicant-Ramkesh, seeking his enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 307 of 2022, under Sections 323 , 304, 308, 504, 506 IPC, Police StationBaccharayun, District-Amroha during the pendency of trial.

4. Record shows that in respect of an incident, which is alleged to have occurred on 25.11.2022, a prompt FIR dated 25.11.2022 was lodged by first informant-Mohit Kumar and was registered as Case Crime No. 307 of 2022, under Sections 323 , 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Baccharayun, District-Amroha. In the aforesaid FIR, applicant-Ramkesh Singh has been nominated as solitary named accused.

5. The gravamen of the allegations made in the FIR to the effect that named accused assaulted the maternal grandmother (Nani) of the first informant namely Naththho Devi on account of which, she sustained injuries. The FIR further states that Mausi of the first informant namely Rakesh Devi was also abused and assaulted by the applicant.

6. After

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top