SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2430

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Mahendra Pratap Singh @ Mintu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Dhirendra Pratap Singh
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in jail since 8.9.2022 in Case Crime No. 263 of 2022 under section 457, 380, 411 IPC, P.S. Jagatpur, District Raebareli. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as he has not committed any offence as alleged.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has given a clear recital in para 8 of the application that the applicant is a truck driver and one Virendra Singh, who is of the same village where the applicant resides, is involved in illegal mining and he is having four tractors and one J.C.B. machine. The applicant made his complaint to the police authorities in the month of August, 2022. Being annoyed from aforesaid complaint of the present applicant such Virendra Singh had threatened the applicant for dire consequences. The Virendra Singh is a friend of Dharmendra Singh, informant / complainant, who lodged the F.I.R. on 7.9.2022 against the unknown persons for the allegation that his suitcase carrying cash and licensed revolver has been stolen. In the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top