SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2424

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Surendra Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Revisionist : Anil Kumar Prajapati
For the Opposite Parties : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.

The present revision is directed against the judgement and order dated 16.9.2022 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Lalitpur in Misc. Case No. 10/2020 ( Smt. Ramdevi @ Mohini v. Surendra Prajapati ), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., P.S. Bar, District Lalitpur whereby revisionist has been directed to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as maintenance to his wife-respondent no. 2 from the date of judgement.

2. Notice has been served upon the respondent no. 2 as per the report of the C.J.M., concerned, but none appeared to press this revision on behalf of the respondent no. 2.

3. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.

4. Brief facts of the case are that respondent no. 2 filed an application for maintenance against her husband under Section 125 Cr.P.C. with averments that her marriage with opposite party was solemnized on 19.4.2014 according to Hindu rites and rituals; her parents had given cash and gifts as per their economic status but her husband and in-laws were not satisfied with the dowry given in her marriage and started demanding of Rs. 02 lakhs as an additional dowry and on non fulfillment they began practicing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top