SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2365

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Sarita – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sumit Shukla,Suresh Chandra Shukla
For the Respondent: Birendra Singh Khokher, G.A., Shailendra Kumar Singh

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The revision holds that a divorced wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. even if she was found guilty of desertion, because the bar under Section 125(4) Cr.P.C. is lifted after divorce. (!) (!) - The court remits the matter for fresh decision on maintenance and directs interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month from the date of judgment, noting that the divorce decree dissolved the marriage, lifting the bar to maintenance claims. (!) - The ex parte decree of divorce, granted on the ground of desertion, does not bar the divorced wife from claiming maintenance as a divorcee once the marriage is dissolved; maintenance can be claimed till remarriage. (!) (!) - The judgment approves the principle that maintenance for a divorced wife under Section 125 is based on the status of being a divorcee, irrespective of prior matrimonial offences, provided the marriage has been dissolved. (!) (!) - The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in light of the lifting of the bar after divorce. (!)

How to claim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. after divorce despite prior desertion findings?

What is the effect of a divorce decree on the bar under Section 125(4) Cr.P.C. for a divorced wife seeking maintenance?

What are the conditions under which a divorced wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. when the marriage has been dissolved?


Table of Content
1. maintenance application details and allegations of cruelty. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding the dismissal of maintenance application. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. counterarguments presented by the opposite party. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's findings on the evidence and claims. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. legal principles regarding maintenance post-divorce. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
6. final ruling on maintenance eligibility post-divorce. (Para 19 , 20)
7. conclusion and order for rehearing of maintenance case. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.

1. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent No.2 is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent and perused the material available on record.

3. The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against the order dated 14.08.2023 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Meerut in Maintenance Case No.292 of 2014, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Sarurpur Khurd, District Meerut. Whereby the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed.

4. Learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top