SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2383

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Limra Developers – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shyam Sunder, Shubham Agrawal, Sudhir Shukla.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.

Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State.

2. Through this writ petition, the order passed by respondent No.2 cancelling registration of the Goods and Service Tax of the petitioner as well as order passed by first Appellate Authority dated 04.09.2021 have been assailed.

3. The Assessee, who was earlier registered under the U.P.Goods and Service Tax Act, was served with a show cause notice on 20.09.2019. A reply was required to be filed by the petitioner within 7 days, which he failed to do so. The show cause notice mentioned that in case of non filing of reply, the order of cancellation of registration would be passed.

4. On 01.10.2019, the Taxing Authority cancelled the registration of the petitioner. Against the order of cancellation, the appeal was preferred at a delayed stage before the first Appellate Authority on 14.4.2021. The first Appellate Authority has rejected the appeal on the ground of limitation hence the present writ petition.

5. Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there is a provision for filing of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top