SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2359

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Anchor Health – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Bipin Kumar Pandey, Aditya Pandey, Counsels.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.

Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record.

3. This writ petition has been filed assailing the order passed by the first appellate authority dated 10.12.2021 in appeal No. GST-0037/2020 under Section 129 (3) of UPGST Act read with Section 20 of IGST Act.

4. Petitioner before this Court is a private limited company registered under Indian Companies Act carrying on the business of manufacturing soaps at Haridwar Unit, Uttarakhand. Petitioner's company is registered under CGST Act. The dispute relates to the assessment year 2017-2018. The goods of the petitioner was being transported from Kutch, Gujarat to Haridwar, Uttarakhand. The goods which were being transported in the form of raw material through a truck were intercepted on 03.03.2018 at Muzaffarnagar. The detaining authority had issued a notice which was replied by the petitioner. The goods were subsequently released complying the provisions of Section 129 (1) (a) of the Act. Thereafter, the first appellate authority has proceeded to pass the order dated 10.12.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top