SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1739

SAMEER JAIN
Dharmraj Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Diwan Saifullah Khan
For the Opposite Party : Amarnath Tripathi,G.A.

JUDGMENT

Sameer Jain, J.

Heard Sri Diwan Saifullah Khan, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Amarnath Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant and Dr. S. B. Maurya, learned AGA for the State-respondent.

2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 132 of 2023, under Sections 409, 420 IPC & 66 D IT Act, Police Station Lalpur, District Varanasi, during pendency of the trial in the court below.

3. FIR of the present case was lodged against the applicant and according to the FIR, applicant is the Proprietor of Real Estate Firm, Devesh Real Estate and after retirement, informant shown his desire to make investment and on the instigation of the applicant, he gave him Rs. 14,40,000/- and after receiving the money, applicant also provided him plot booking receipts but applicant neither provided plot to the informant nor returned his money.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that entire allegation made against the applicant is false and baseless and from the FIR, itself it appears that it is a dispute of civil nature.

5. He further submitted that with regard to the money of Rs. 14,40,000/- informant and his wife, filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top