SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1734

SAMIT GOPAL
Rajesh Kumar Gaur – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicants : Deepak Prajapati, Srishti Singh, Suresh Kumar Maurya.
For the Opposite Parties : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Samit Gopal, J.

List revised.

2. Heard Sri. Rajat Sonkar holding brief of Sri. Suresh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri. Shree Krishna Tiwari, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on records.

3. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant-Rajesh Kumar Gaur, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.0002 of 2024, under Sections 7/7A, 12, 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 120B IPC, Police Station Anti Corruption, District Azamgarh.

4. As per the prosecution case on the complaint dated 3.2.2024 of Suraj Pratap, the complainant, FIR was lodged on 6.2.2024 against Umesh Kumar Yadav, Rajesh Kumar Gaur and Hitendra Krishna alleging therein that the complainant was falsely implicated in a case of which FIR dated 26.11.2023 was lodged as Case Crime No.546 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308, 34 IPC at Police Station Deogaon, District Azamgarh which was being investigated by Hitesh Krishna, the Circle Officer. Umesh Kumar Yadav who was the reader of Circle Officer, made a demand of bribe of Rs. 15,000/- for getting th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top