SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1848

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Jay Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Anjula Singh Mahaur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: In Person, Shiv Kumar Singh

JUDGMENT

Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.

Heard Sri. Shiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the election petitioners.

2. The petitioners describe themselves as `electors' from Hathras, Sadar Constituency in the election of the Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh. By means of the present election petition, they seek to impugn the election of respondent no.1 at the last concluded Assembly Election-2022.

3. Undisputedly, the respondent no.1 was declared successful at that election, on 10.3.2022. section 81(1) of the Representation of The People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') reads as below:

    "81. Presentation of petitions.- (1) An election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in [sub-section (1)] of section 100 and section 101 to the [High Court] by any candidate at such election or any elector [within forty-five days from, but not earlier than the date of election of the returned candidate or if there are more than one returned candidate at the election and dates of their election are different, the later of those two dates]."

4. The present Election Petition was presented before this Court on 8.2.2024. On that da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top