SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2650

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, VINOD DIWAKAR
Sunil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Seema Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Vinod Singh and Suraj Kumar Singh, Advocates.

Table of Content
1. interim maintenance awarded under family courts act (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding maintenance claims and payments (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning against interference in the lower court's decision (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
4. maintenance aims to prevent destitution; varying claims considered. (Para 6)
5. restrictions on dual interim maintenance payment (Para 9)
6. instructions for payment of arrears and their enforcement (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Heard Shri. Vinod Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.

2. Present appeal has been filed under section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984, arising from the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 22 of 2017 (Sunil Kumar Singh v. Seema Singh) referable to section 24 of HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The learned court below has awarded interim maintenance @ 8000/- per month to the respondent, and further Rs. 5000/- per month to her minor son from the date of her application i.e. 24.9.2019 and has further provided for one time legal expense Rs. 5000/-.

3. Submission of learned cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top