Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, VINOD DIWAKAR
Pawan Kumar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
Heard Shri Suresh Chandra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Arimardan Singh Rajput, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh.
2. Petitioner has made complaint against the private-respondent with respect to concealment of vital information regarding pendency of fourteen criminal cases, of which he has been convicted in four cases. By concealing that information, the respondent has obtained a license to practice law, though according to learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent stands quite distanced from law.
3. Whatever be the true facts, at present the complaint appears to be pending with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh since 25.9.2022. Much
The court established that the issuance of licenses to practice law requires thorough background checks, including police verification, to uphold the integrity of the legal profession.
The right to practice law must adhere to explicit legislative provisions, where judicial directives cannot impose additional disqualifications beyond those established in statutes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the queries in an application form must be specific and not vague, and a candidate cannot be held accountable for not responding to a query wh....
The court emphasizes that minor omissions in self-disclosure during recruitment can be reconsidered if disclosed later, balancing integrity with the potential for rehabilitation.
The Bar Council can initiate disciplinary action based on a reasonable belief of wrongdoing or a formal complaint without infringing on an advocate's rights until a final order is made.
The deliberate suppression of information to secure employment constitutes cheating under Section 420 of the IPC, emphasizing the importance of fraudulent intention and deliberate deception in establ....
Non-disclosure of juvenile criminal cases by candidates does not constitute concealment, and such grounds cannot invalidate employment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article