A. S. SUPEHIA
Rajendrasinh Dansangbhai Mori – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Learned advocate Mr.Mehta waives service of notice of rule for the respondent.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under :-
2.1. The petitioner had completed his Bachelor’s degree in law from Gujarat University in the month of September, 2020. After completing his Bachelors’ degree in law, he was desireous of enrolling himself as an advocate with the Bar Council of Gujarat and he had submitted the enrollment form along with the necessary fees to the office of the Bar Council of Gujarat on 10.11.2020.
2.2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of the fact that the application of the petitioner for enrollment is pending with the respondent authority since long, the same is not being put up before the Enrollment Committee meeting for being provisionally enrolled as an Advocate. The writ petition was filed at a stage when the petitioner was to appear in the All India Bar Examination-2016 (AIBE), for which the process of registration was going on and the date for registration was extended till 14.08.2021. The petitioner has subsequently cleared the same.
2.3. As the petitioner’s enrollment was being unduly delayed, the petitioner had personally approached
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.