SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2758

SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Vishal Noble Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Sudhanshu Kumar, A.D. Saunders, Rajrshi Gupta
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Laxman Pathak, Neeraj Kumar

JUDGMENT

Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.

vkosnu i= vUrxZr/kkjk 482 la[;k 33816 o"kZ 2022] vkosnd fo'kky ukscy flag ,oa vkosnu i= vUrxZr/kkjk 482 la[;k 33242 o"kZ 2022] vkosnd fouksn fcgkjh yky dh vksj ls nkf.Md okn la[;k 16760 o"kZ 2017 ¼jkT; izfr fc'ki ihVj cYnso ,oa vU;½] eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 476 o"kZ 2017] vUrxZr/kkjk 406] 419] 420] 467] 468] 471 ,oa 120ch0] Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk flfoy ykbUl] ftyk bykgkckn esa nkf[ky vkjksi i= fnukafdr 4&10&2017 ,oa mDr okn esa fo}ku eq[; U;kf;d eftLVsªV] bykgkckn }kjk ikfjr izlaKku vkns'k fnukad 21&9&2022 rFkk mDr okn dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr djus gsrq ;ksftr fd;k x;k gSA

2.- pw¡fd nksuks okn ,d gh vijk/k la[;k ,d gh nkf.Md okn ls lEcfU/kr gS] vr,o mDr nksuks oknksa dks lesfdr djrs gq, ,d lkFk fuLrkfjr fd;s tk jgs gSaA

3.- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh eqdnek fnokdj ukFk f=ikBh us fnukad 9&8&2017 dks Fkkuk flfoy ykbUl ftyk bykgkckn esa ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ bl vk'k; dh ntZ djk;h fd fc'ki tkulu Ldwy ,oa dkyst] egkRek xka/kh ekxZ] flfoy ykbUl] vkbZ0 lh0 ,l0 bZ0 ls ekU;rk izkIr vaxzsth ek/;e dk b.VjehfM,V dkyst gS tks Mk;kslsfl,u ,twds'ku cksMZ fn Mk;ksfll vkQ y[kuA uked lkslk;Vh ls lapkfyr gksrk gSA Mk;ksfll vkQ y[kuA ppZ vkQ ukFkZ bf.M;k ds v/kh


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top