SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2743

SHIV SHANKER PRASAD
Mukesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Revisionist :Sunil Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Deep Chand Singh.

JUDGMENT

Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.

Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State as well as perused the materials on record.

2. This criminal revision has been filed for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 09.06.2023 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Khurja, District Bulandshahar in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2022 (Mukesh Singh v. State of U.P. & Another) and impugned judgment and order dated 25.11.2022 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, District Bulandshahar in Complaint Case No. 439 of 2018 (Vinod Kumar v. Mukesh Singh), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. On 08.08.2023, the Court has passed following order:

    "Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

    This revision has been filed for quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 09.06.2023 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2022 (Mukesh Singh v. State of U.P. & Another) and the judgment and order dated 25.11.2022 passed in Complaint Case No. 439 of 2018 (Vinod Kumar v. Mukesh Singh), under Section 138 N.I. Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top